Translator: Michele Gianella Reviewer: Elisabeth Buffard
Sometimes, easy means difficult.
Have you ever been assigned an easy task,
which for you is actually very difficult to perform,
and maybe for nobody else?
That is when you experience frustration.
I have experienced that when I started taking singing lessons,
and my teacher told me to breathe with my diaphragm.
That’s easy, it’s our natural breath, but actually very difficult to do,
and it’s a secret of the great singers.
It’s similar to what happens
when a boss comes into a meeting and tells you to think out of the box.
Think out of the box. I want to hear that.
Easy, simple, but actually very hard to do.
You need to practice.
You need to know how to get out of the box, where to go,
and how to come back inside the box, because that’s where we live.
We actually live inside our boxes.
I want to ask these questions.
I asked those questions to myself.
This presentation is a little journey through my answers.
I hope that some of these will resonate with yours.
The first thing is to ask, why.
Why should you really go out of the box?
Because inside the box, we feel safe.
We agree with everybody else.
And when we go out, we risk our reputation.
We worked so hard for a lifetime to build it up,
why should we risk it?
Is this something which is a luxury, that only a few people can do,
or is it really a necessity?
Think of our lives today.
We are really a part of a network.
We are nodes in a network.
We share information in a real time,
and we, in the end, all possess the same information.
That’s the end of it, and that is a scary thought.
If we all possess the same information,
what makes a difference between ourselves?
Where does our dignity as human beings lie?
It really depends on what we generate with that common shared information.
To think creatively, to go out of the box, is not a luxury.
It’s a necessity for us, and for our dignity as human beings.
Which box are we talking about?
We must have a clear definition,
so that we are really talking about something specific.
It’s not our mind; we cannot think out of our minds.
It’s a boundary within our minds.
The boundary between what we know,
and what we haven’t still, or yet, thought about.
What is our knowledge structure?
It’s an emergent phenomenon out of the complex mechanism,
We start with initial conditions, our genetic heritage.
We have boundary conditions, the environment.
We have indirect experience,
years and years spent in school and University
to learn what other people have thought,
what other people have discovered,
what other people have created.
Then, we have our own direct experience,
our successes, our failures that really make what we are.
All of this builds the anthill within which we live,
and we live very well in that.
Whatever we think inside that anthill, that box, we feel safe.
Whatever is outside, it’s invisible to us.
We don’t know what it’s outside.
That is why it’s so risky, because nobody else knows.
We are faced with something which is necessary to our dignity,
but actually it’s very difficult to do.
How do we go out of the box? How do we do that?
What are the mechanisms?
Do we need to wait for an apple to fall on our heads,
or are there some specific techniques?
Reality is out there for us to perceive it.
It’s beautiful. You see these flowers.
We have a lot of ideas, which is our convergent information,
Whenever we need to think about an area, a focused area,
we have ideas on how things should be.
We have requirements, we have specifications.
We know how things are,
because that’s the way they always have been.
But if we want to go out of the box,
we need to add something more, a little spice,
something which goes beyond the convergent information.
Something wrong, something absurd,
something which apparently is not relevant,
something which takes us far.
This is what we call divergent information.
We need a little bit of that divergent information
to cross the borders within our minds,
from what we know to what we haven’t yet thought about.
This is the essential mechanism that is necessary,
and it takes us to a place where we don’t really know where to go.
It’s like the middle game in chess.
Where do you go once you’re out of the box?
You have no preset direction.
It’s really a potential situation
that brings us to a feeling that we should immediately go back.
This does not make any sense.
Let’s go back to safe place. Let’s go back inside the box.
That’s a temptation that we need to resist.
We need to value long thinking.
Normally, we talk about brilliant thinking,
fast thinking, deep thinking,
but here we’re talking about something different,
What does that mean?
It’s some thought that takes us far.
It’s as if you were reading poetry or listening to music.
You don’t judge the single notes.
You don’t judge the single words.
It’s the ensemble that gives you a feeling, and takes you far.
We must do the same thing with our concepts.
We can use association of ideas,
combination of ideas, extraction of principles,
and application of those principles
to areas where they were never applied before.
We need to be open-minded. We need to be fluent.
Look for alternatives, and not for the correct answer.
Because when you think creatively, there’s no single correct answer.
There are many possible alternatives.
Suppose now that we are lucky.
We land upon a new idea in our travel,
in the exploration out of the box.
What is the value of that?
How do we assess the value of a new idea?
It’s very difficult if it’s really new, because you’ve never seen that before.
Nobody else has seen that before.
It’s as if we landed on a new planet, totally undiscovered territory.
It’s difficult to understand the value of something new.
First of all, because we don’t feel entitled to be inventors.
Who am I to be the generator of that new idea?
Probably this has been thought about before.
If this is correct, somebody else would have done it before me.
These are all natural mechanisms with which we kill our own ideas.
We have to resist that.
We have to look for the match between the new idea
and our initial drive, our initial focus,
or evaluate the idea per se, for its own value
and maybe see that that’s something that solves another problem,
which it was not yours.
Serendipity happens all the time.
We just need to have the eyes to see that,
to notice the difference.
Ok, but we are social animals.
We live in an environment,
so to think out of the box, bring in new ideas,
is going to challenge that environment.
When is it a good idea to challenge everybody around you
in your working environment?
You don’t really want to upset him or her.
When is it a good idea to think out of the box?
First of all, if the environment punishes mistakes,
you will never be really tempted to go out of the box.
You will remain safely in a known environment.
If you want to stimulate an environment which is creative,
you need to allow the existence of divergent information.
You need to allow irrelevant information to come in.
You have to mix and match different disciplines.
You have to use metaphors in the organization.
Only in that case, you will allow the environment
to be really prone to the generation of new ideas.
I want to end my talk with a little experiment.
We wanted to do this interactively with you,
but the time is scarce.
I have indeed prepared a little thing,
but if you believe me, and to be honest,
this has been generated in the space of few minutes.
The generation of ideas, this travel outside of the box,
is something which happens very fast.
Where should we experiment?
Let’s say that we want to generate new ideas about TEDx Conferences.
We are here, so that’s a focused area which is very clear to all of us.
Let’s start from the convergent information about TEDx Conferences.
What is needed to make an excellent, good TEDx conference?
You need the brilliant speakers that will come up.
You need an excellent theme.
You need fast speaker to speaker transitions.
You need grand settings.
The list can go on, and all I’m saying is things that you already know.
This is all convergent information, safe.
I’m not generating anything new. I’m inside the box.
Now I want to go out,
so I apply a divergent modifier
to any of these convergent elements.
Start from the last one for example, the grand setting.
A divergent modifier, for example, is to exaggerate.
Bring it to the limit.
Instead of thinking of a TEDx conferences in a theater,
think of a TEDx Conference in a stadium.
Does this make any sense, in a stadium?
Very difficult to organize, even more difficult than in a theater,
and how do you fill the place?
How do you fill the stadium?
It’s too difficult. It doesn’t make any sense.
I’m tempted to reject that idea.
But then I move, and I say,
ok, maybe the stadium is already filled with people.
From that, you can get the idea
of having a TEDx Conference at half-time of football matches,
a network of speeches which happens at half-time of football matches.
Good idea, bad idea? I leave it for you to assess.
Take another element: good speakers, brilliant speakers.
That’s the most fundamental element of a TEDx Conference.
Let’s take that away.
We eliminate the good, brilliant speakers.
Does this make any sense? No, we’re out of the box.
Does this lead to anything useful?
I could say that, OK, I don’t need the speakers,
but I need the speeches, the talks, the scripts.
From this comes the idea
of one speaker delivering the speech of somebody else.
We exchange speakers.
So it’s a cooperative TEDx Conference.
Maybe we have duets on stage, instead of a single element,
or we have people that speak about,
somebody has this topic.
In that way we have one advantage at least.
We take away the element of the ego.
There’s no ego anymore,
if you’re speaking with somebody else’s script.
These are just examples, just examples,
to show you that it’s possible and not too hard, actually,
to think out of the box.
I hope this journey, in a way, was interesting for you,
and now you want to do more of that.
Thank you very much for your attention.